Back to Main Site
The New American Mind Conservative Forum
Search  Match Words  Match Phrase
     Search Help
       Contact
       Forum Home - Category List


Category/Topic - In The News - Current Events /You Can Take the Chimp Out of the Jungle, But....
Initial Topic started by WHS - Monday, February 23, 2009 - 9:27 am

Back to Posts Back to complete thread



Post by WHS
Monday, February 23, 2009 - 9:27 am

Item: On Feb. 12, Muzzammil "Mo" Hassan, 44, walked into the police station in Orchard Park, N.Y., and told officials his wife, 37-year-old Aasiya Hassan, was dead. "Mo" has lived in the U.S. for thirty years. He and his wife were married for eight years. He had beheaded his wife in the Islamic tradition of "honor" killing.

Item: Fourteen year old domestic chimpanzee named Travis violently attacked fifty five year old Charla Nash of Stamford, Conn., ripping her face off and chewing off both her hands. The attack was provoked by the chimp's reversion to his instinct to protect family and mate when Ms. Nash came to help lure Travis back into the house from which he had escaped. Travis had been raised by his owner, Sandra Herold, since infancy to live as a person in just about every way.

What do these two items have in common? Obvious, isn't it? It doesn't matter how long you try, you can't acculturate a potentially dangerous person or animal once it has been formed, by instinct in the animal's case or by the original culture in the case of a human being. We are playing with a very dangerous, pie-in-the-sky idea when we ignore the facts. And the current political correctness concerning our acting as if Muslim culture can exist compatibly in Western society is endangering our existence as a Western culture.

It is easy to see this with chimps, and it looks like laws will be passed in realistic recognition of this idea. But, we will persist in ignoring the fact that CAIR and other Islamic interests in this country have as a boldly stated plan to convert the USA to sharia law. What will it take for Western culture to recognize the truth of the precarious nature of their continued existence?